Germany – I dread you, especially in Saxony-Anhalt
- Bernd Liske
- 10 hours ago
- 5 min read
Degeneracy as part of the German constitution
Democracy will probably become the illusion of the 21st century.
As a responsible German, humanist, and Christian, I am increasingly coming to the realization that the world must be warned about us Germans. When we invoke the value-based order, democracy, humanity, our constitution, and the law as expressions of our moral compass, in reality this is nothing more than a cloak under which we hide our depravity. When even t-online, one of the leading media outlets for Russophobic demagoguery and monocultural dumbing down of the population, cannot help but describe the sick way in which Europeans treat @POTUS in order to satisfy their war mongering, "That is why Europeans are trying to influence Trump in every way possible: with concessions, flattery, downright embarrassing subservience." – to interpret this, of course, as efforts to achieve a "just peace" – then political action is only the publicly visible part of a social constitution that behaves no differently.
The impetus for this text came from seven decisions by the Saxony-Anhalt Finance Court that I received the day before yesterday – extremely comprehensive and coordinated in time with other events, such as a hearing in the Petitions Committee of the Saxony-Anhalt state parliament, which I approached because the Dessau-Roßlau public prosecutor's office, the Naumburg Public Prosecutor's Office, and the Saxony-Anhalt Ministry of Justice did not deal with my criminal complaint against a judge at the Finance Court for document forgery, perjury, white torture, and various other offenses ("did not" in a sense directly perceptible to me) – against whom I have been suing the Magdeburg tax office since 2014 (!!!) for fraud, coercion, and violation of public decency. If you would like to get a small idea of my experiences, you can find a little bit about them in two articles on my homepage: Am I an idiot?
I will go into this in more detail later, but I would like to point out a few things that are systemically relevant. For years, I have been able to observe how the courts – especially in Saxony-Anhalt – violate the Basic Law, the law, and the case law of the Federal Constitutional Court, with judges legitimizing each other's arbitrary, corrupt, and ignorant jurisprudence. I can now say with certainty that public prosecutors and politicians take no offense at this and are compliant accomplices. Ultimately, they enforce the law of the strongest and act as collaborators of German unity. Two reasons come to mind.
The first: In a degenerate society that derives its actions primarily from self-interest, it is unrealistic to assume that judges, prosecutors, and politicians are not just as degenerate. In this respect, the view that the judiciary is independent is an untenable myth, and I have long advocated for an independent technical inspection agency that continuously monitors the judiciary to ensure that it adheres to the norms of the Basic Law, the law, and case law. In addition to political influence—just look at the current drama surrounding the appointment of new judges to the Federal Constitutional Court and ask yourself what influence this will have on future decisions—judges are also affected by a deeply rooted inability to incorporate criticism into their own development. Instead, they regard it as polluting the atmosphere, and in this respect, judges also shy away – out of self-interest – from questioning the jurisprudence of their colleagues. Their priest-like de facto inviolability does not allow the narrow-minded to defend the law with humility, but rather their own right to administer justice as they see fit. Since the judiciary has been operating in this way for some time, there is now plenty of precedent to draw on. The moral of these thoughts can only be that, in view of the degeneration of our society, the independence of the judiciary is a threat to the free democratic basic order and needs to be redesigned, for, as Heraclitus said, the people should fight for the law as they would for their walls.
The second reason stems from the consequences of German reunification. One of these is that, with the Basic Law and the law, we have been given standards that I have come to appreciate greatly, because they allow me to measure foreign and my own thinking and to base my actions on them: However, in East Germany, the courts are predominantly staffed by West German judges who act in a lordly manner and want to break East Germans like me, who are seeking a prosperous future for Germany with #modernDenken and who, in doing so, have to analyze the problems that need to be overcome and create analytical situation reports for which the truth is an indispensable prerequisite. What the fathers of the Basic Law gave to the Germans is being robbed of its substance by today's generations.
It was obviously a big mistake for East Germans to allow themselves to be taken for fools during the transition period, and if we Germans today paint Russia, Iran, China, Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, the Palestinians, etc. in the most beautiful colors, but show no "respect" for their social models and people, they should all reflect on developments in East Germany in order to understand what awaits them if they listen to the whisperings from the West. We Germans cannot be trusted, and if you do trust us, you should remember the fable of the scorpion and the frog. We Germans have discredited ourselves as a society, and until we have managed to recover from climate change, we have no right to explain values to the world.
The bad thing for our country is – although I can seriously speak of a multitude of efforts to address very different groups and individuals in order to intervene in this systemic constitution in very different ways for the benefit of our country and its citizens – that I currently see no group – I repeat, no group – that is willing and able to tackle these problems in a substantial way. We remain stuck in our constitution and consider it normal, but it is moving further and further away from the set of values we claim to live by. And when I have provided, with my aphorisms on the humanization of the ape and my concept of being human, both guidance and a toolbox for addressing these problems in a sustainable manner—but also with my peace plan for the Middle East and many other specific problems—only to find that people are not interested, I think I have identified a reason for this: The moral level is obviously not high enough.
Normally, my texts are characterized by the analytical part being followed by the creative part: I do not feel capable of doing that at the moment. Germany seems to be a hopeless case.
Germany 2025, I dread you: In the fourth year after the 33rd year of the "turning point" of the fall of the Berlin Wall – on the way to the 39th year, which this time will probably come much faster.
